(For the English version, please scroll down.)

「民主主義における人権の認知戦的敗北とは？」

基本的人権という言葉を人類が使うようになって何世紀経つかわからないが
その人権というものの意義深さや本質は
今も浸透し切ってはいないように思える

あるいはそのようなものの存在を
「諦めてしまっている」
だけなのかもしれない

だから権力に走り
自己利益のみに固執する
恐怖や不安がそうさせてるってわけだ

右も左も関係なく
そういった情動を
根底的には感じる

しかし民主主義において
人権が存在するには
人々が人権の存在を信じることが
大前提な訳で

それを人々がやめてしまう
あるいはそうさせられてしまう
というのはまさしく
認知戦における敗北である
としか言いようがない

その場合において
果たして本質的な勝者が誰であるのか
それも私にはわからないのだ

あるいは真の勝者など
その場合は存在しないのかもしれない

“What Is the Cognitive-Warfare Defeat of Human Rights in Democracy?”

I don’t know how many centuries have passed since humanity began using the term “fundamental human rights,”
but even now, it seems the profound significance and true essence of what we call human rights have still not fully taken root.

Or perhaps it is simply that people have
“given up”
on the very idea that such a thing could exist.

That is why they run toward power,
clinging only to self-interest —
it is fear and anxiety that drive them to do so.

Regardless of right or left,
I sense that same underlying emotion
at a fundamental level.

Yet in a democracy,
for human rights to exist at all,
the absolute precondition is that people believe in their existence.

When people stop believing that —
or are made to abandon that belief —
it can only be described as
a defeat in cognitive warfare.

In such a case,
who the true, essential victor would be,
I honestly do not know.

Or perhaps, in that scenario,
no true victor exists at all.

(For the English version, please scroll down.)

昨日、佐藤二朗と橋本愛とフジテレビの問題についてサラッと私見を述べたが

真意は伝わっただろうか？

申し訳ないけど俺は誰の肩も持てないし

ある意味では誰の味方にもなれるということだ

いやあまあだってさ？

規模が小さいとはいえ

俺なんて制作、監督、脚本、主演で

キャスティングまでやって

ラブストーリーやってるわけだ

哀しいことだけど

いくら純粋にクリエイティブを

突き詰めていたとしても

タダでは安心は生まれてはくれないし

どれだけ気をつけても足りないくらいだし

うまいことチームで空気作りだって

やらなきゃ良いもん撮れるはずもないわけだ

勿論、盛大に失敗したこともあるよ

それを役者たるもの〜という

「べき論」で片付けられたら

そんなに楽なことはなかったし

俺も随分とラクにはなるけど

残念ながらそれを悪用してきた方々が

かつても今もたくさんいらっしゃって

という歴史がある以上

安易にその地点に戻せるはずもないわけだ

どうすれば安心が生まれるかということは

常に考えなければならないことであって

そう簡単なことでもないということだ

かと言って少し失敗したからと言って

社会的に抹殺されるようなことでも

ないということだよ

よほど悪意ある行為なら別だが…

同様に未熟者を未熟者と糾弾したところで

糾弾者も社会も

何も得るものはないということだ

“The Kindest World”

Yesterday, I casually shared my own take on the situation involving Jiro Sato, Ai Hashimoto, and Fuji TV, but I wonder if what I truly meant actually came across.

I’m sorry, but the truth is I can’t take anyone’s side — and in a way, that also means I can be on anyone’s side.

I mean, come on, right? Even though it’s on a much smaller scale, I myself handle production, directing, screenwriting, and starring — I even do the casting — and I make love stories.

It’s a sad reality, but no matter how purely you pursue creativity, a sense of safety doesn’t just appear for free. No matter how careful you are, it’s never quite enough, and unless you manage to build the right atmosphere as a team, there’s no way you can shoot something truly good. Of course, I’ve had my share of spectacular failures too.

If all of this could simply be brushed off with a “this is how an actor ought to be” kind of “ought-to” argument, nothing would be easier — and honestly, it would make my own life a lot easier too. But unfortunately, there is a long history of people who have exploited exactly that kind of thinking, both in the past and today, and given that history, there’s no way we can casually go back to that way of thinking.

How to create a genuine sense of safety is something we must constantly keep thinking about — it’s not a simple question with an easy answer.

That said, making a small mistake doesn’t mean someone should be socially obliterated. Unless, of course, it was an act of real malicious intent — that’s a different matter entirely…

Likewise, even if you condemn someone immature for being immature, neither the one doing the condemning nor society as a whole gains anything from it.

(For the English version, please scroll down.)

危機管理といえば聞こえはいいが

5周くらいして思ったことはやはり

佐藤二朗のおっさん

少々、大人気ないのでは？

勝新太郎なら笑い飛ばして

謝って終わりだった気がするし

無茶苦茶やっても許されたのは

そういうとこにあったかもしれん

とはいえ

橋本愛の肩を持つ気もなければ

まあフジテレビは正直

最悪だと思うけども…

社会全体の器が

どんどん小さくなってるわな

誰から変わるかやで？

年長者としては常に

気をつけておきたいところ

できれば、粋ではありたいよね

なかなか簡単ではないけど

「正しさよりも美しさ」

俺自身、大人気なかったなと

思うことがたくさんあって

その度にうまくいかなくて

なんでこうなっちゃったんだろう

って思うことも多かったから尚更かな

だって思いやりのない世の中で

どうやってクリエイティブ

やってくっていうの？

それで本当に後世に残るような

ホンモノの芸術が生まれるとでも

本気で思ってるのか？

思ってるとしたら

よほど勘違いも甚だしいと思うが

誰も彼も自分のことしか考えてないじゃん

それは、舐めすぎだと思うよ

自身の矜持を誇っているように見せかけて

実際はそうでないのではないか？

そういう考えができた時にはじめて

現状は少し良くなるのではないかな？

この対談はまさにみんなに観てほしい内容になってると思うな

佐藤二朗、橋本愛、フジテレビ問題のみならず

世の中のありとあらゆることを包括しうるテーマについて

それぞれ別の視点から話せたと思う

まあ言ってみりゃ

Man In The Mirrorの世界観だよな

“Man In The Mirror”

“Crisis management” sounds fine when you put it that way, but after going around it in my head about five times, what I keep coming back to is this: isn’t that old guy, Jiro Sato, being a bit childish? I feel like if it had been Shintaro Katsu, he would’ve just laughed it off, apologized, and that would’ve been the end of it. Maybe the reason he got away with doing all sorts of outrageous things was precisely because of that kind of attitude.

That said, it’s not like I’m trying to take Ai Hashimoto’s side either, and honestly, I think Fuji TV is the worst, but still…

Society’s overall capacity for tolerance keeps getting smaller and smaller, doesn’t it? The question is — who’s going to be the one to change first? As someone older, that’s something I always want to stay mindful of. If possible, I’d like to remain “iki” — graceful and stylish in spirit. It’s not exactly easy, though.

“Beauty over being right.”

There have been plenty of times I’ve looked back and thought I was being childish myself. Every single time, things didn’t go well, and I’d find myself wondering, “why did it end up like this?” Maybe that’s exactly why this hits home even more for me.

Because in a world without compassion, how are we even supposed to keep doing creative work?

Do people genuinely, seriously believe that real art — the kind that actually lasts for generations — can be born out of that kind of environment?

If they do think so, I’d say that’s a pretty serious delusion. Everyone’s only thinking about themselves, aren’t they?

I think that’s underestimating things way too much. They make it look like they’re proud of their own sense of integrity, but isn’t the reality actually different?

Only once we’re able to think that way will the current situation start to get a little better, don’t you think?

I really think this conversation is something everyone should watch. Beyond just the Jiro Sato, Ai Hashimoto, and Fuji TV issue, I think we managed to talk from our own different perspectives about a theme that can encompass pretty much everything going on in the world.

Well, if you had to put it simply, it’s basically the world of “Man in the Mirror,” isn’t it.

(For the English version, please scroll down.)

人類の進化に貢献というと
ピンと来ないかもしれないけど

「希少な才能が理解されずに埋もれていくことがなくなる」とか
「不用意に傷つく人がいなくなる」とか
「不毛なストレスなく生産性が上がる」とか

わりとそういう話で
結果的に
「本当に好きなことを誰でも気兼ねなくしやすくなる」だろうし
「誰だって夢を持てる」だろうし

それをやるには
「なんだかわからないけどできる気がする」
と思える人が増えてもらいたいわけだよな

俺の中では既に結論が出てるから
協力してくれたら嬉しいなって話なんやけど

それって実現して困る人はさすがにいないよね？
別に誰かを悪者にしようって話じゃないんだ
あくまでクリエイティブな未来の話をしているだけなんだよ

まさしくそれがDandy Asobi Clubなんだが
俺別にスーパーマンじゃないから
1人じゃさすがに大変やで

まあそれでもなんとかはするけどね

誰もがエネルギーを有効活用できるための
構造改革であり意識改革なんだよな

その為にはまず思考を過去から
完全に切り離す必要があるねん

正直言って初期条件なんていうのは
未来予測に関して言えば
所詮は定数でしかないので
大した影響力はないわけで

問題は過去に縛られる思考そのものによる
強烈な反発力の方が圧倒的に影響は大きい

だったら解決法は簡単でしょ？
過去を手放せばいいだけ
せいぜい参考程度に
データ利用するってくらいで十分なんだよな

だって構造そのもの
流行り言葉で言えばアルゴリズムになるのかな
それ自体を変えてしまうんなら
過去のデータなんてほぼ意味がないわけなんだから

Contributing to Human Evolution — What That Really Means

When I say “contributing to human evolution,” that might not immediately click with you, but let me break it down into concrete terms:

• Rare talents will no longer be buried simply because they weren’t understood or recognized
• People won’t get hurt needlessly through avoidable misunderstandings and conflicts
• Productivity will rise without the drain of pointless, unproductive stress

That’s essentially what we’re talking about here. And when those things happen, the natural result is a world where anyone can freely pursue what they genuinely love without hesitation, and anyone can dare to have a dream — no holding back, no apologies needed.

The Key Ingredient: Unshakeable Confidence

To make that happen, what we really need is more people who feel that quiet, instinctive sense of “I don’t know exactly how, but I feel like I can do this.” That kind of confidence is what changes everything.

The conclusion is already crystal clear in my mind, so honestly, I’d be thrilled to have people collaborate on this. And when you think about it — who would actually be worse off if this became reality? Nobody, right? This isn’t about pointing fingers or making anyone the villain. I’m purely talking about building toward a creative future that benefits everyone.

Enter the Dandy Asobi Club

That vision is exactly what Dandy Asobi Club is all about. But here’s the thing — I’m not Superman, so tackling this alone is honestly pretty tough. I’ll make it work either way, but still, having allies makes all the difference.

The Real Work: Structural and Consciousness Reform

At its core, this is about structural reform and a fundamental shift in consciousness — creating systems where every person can make the most of their energy without waste.

To get there, the first crucial step is completely detaching our thinking from the past. We need to break those mental chains entirely.

Why the Past Doesn’t Matter (As Much As You Think)

Here’s the honest truth: when it comes to predicting the future, initial conditions are ultimately just constants — they don’t carry nearly as much weight as we assume they do. What actually dominates outcomes is the massive resistance generated by thinking that’s still anchored to the past. That psychological force has far more influence than any starting point ever could.

So the solution is beautifully simple: just let go of the past. Use it as reference data at most — treat it like any other data point, nothing more sacred than that.

Because here’s the kicker — if you’re changing the structure itself, the underlying algorithm to use the trendy term, then historical data becomes almost irrelevant anyway. You’re essentially describing a completely different system at that point.

The bottom line: When you transform the fundamental framework, past limitations become meaningless. That’s where real evolution happens.

「議論のあるべき姿とは？」

(For the English version, please scroll down.)

俺は議論ってのは必ずしも
結論を出すためのものじゃないと思ってるわけ
物事の解像度を高めるためにやるものなんだと
つまり共鳴には欠かせないプロセスなんだ
そういう意味ではディベートってのは全く別物だと考えてるのね
あれは要するに明確な二項対立を作って詭弁でもなんでも勝ちゃいいっていうゲームだし
ほぼほぼ血の気に飢えた殴り合いに近い
それがわかってるからこそ俺は議論の方を重視しているわけだし
ディベートのことを議論だと思っているとすれば
それは何か間違ったものに刷り込まれた大いなる勘違いだと思う
本来、純粋な議論においては
誰かの存在が脅かされるようなものであるはずがないんだよ
だって勝ち負けなんてないわけだから
意地を張る必要もなければ
妥協する必要もない
全員が共鳴に向かって議論すればいいだけ
それは「気づき」という
傷みを伴うことはあるかもしれないが
傷つく必要なんて本当は全くないんだ
本来の人権主義の立場に立てば
誰もがその存在を否定されることはないわけだから
性善説的に言えば、自明だということになる
無論、簡単でないことはわかってはいるけども
心やさしい人こそ
知性・感性・精神性の3つが充実した
哲人になってもらえたらいいなという想いが
消えることはないだろうね

“The Way Discussion Ought to Be”

The way I see it, discussion isn’t something you do to reach a conclusion. It’s about increasing the resolution of how we understand things—sharpening our perception of reality itself. In other words, it’s an absolutely essential process for achieving genuine resonance between people.

The Fundamental Distinction:

That’s precisely why I consider debate to be something completely different. Debate is basically a game where you create a clear binary opposition and then do whatever it takes to win—sophistry included, no questions asked. It’s practically like a bloodthirsty brawl, driven more by a hunger for victory than any meaningful exchange of understanding.

Because I recognize this distinction so clearly, I place far greater value on genuine discussion. If someone thinks that debate and discussion are the same thing, I’d say that’s a profound misconception—most likely the result of being conditioned by something fundamentally flawed along the way.

The Nature of Pure Discussion:

In truly pure discussion, no one’s existence should ever feel threatened. And there’s a simple reason for this: there are no winners or losers. There’s no need to dig your heels in out of stubborn pride, and equally, there’s no need to compromise your authentic perspective. Everyone simply engages with the shared goal of moving toward resonance together.

Growth Without Harm:

This process involves what I’d call “realization” or genuine awakening—moments of insight that might come with some growing pains. But here’s the crucial point: while there may be some discomfort that accompanies new understanding, there’s truly no need for anyone to actually get hurt or wounded in the process.

The Humanistic Foundation:

From a genuinely humanistic standpoint, no one’s existence should ever be denied or diminished. If we approach this from a perspective that believes in the fundamental goodness of human nature, this principle should be entirely self-evident—something that requires no argument at all.

An Enduring Hope:

Of course, I understand that none of this is simple to put into practice. The realities of human interaction can be complex and deeply challenging. But there’s one hope I carry that will probably never fade: that it’s precisely the kind-hearted people of this world who will step forward to become true philosophers—individuals who are richly fulfilled across all three dimensions of intellect, sensitivity, and spirituality. That quiet wish is something I don’t expect to let go of anytime soon.